The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Analysis of Current Globalization
In an globalized world, the debate on globalization is often positioned at the crossroads of varied perspectives on autonomy and equity. The book by Junon Moneta, which is not a pamphlet opposed to globalization itself, aims to redefine the contours of a new humanism by the filter of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotle. By critiquing artificial exchanges that fuel modern systems of oppression and vulnerability, Moneta draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to highlight the gaps of our global financial structure.
Looking back in time, globalization is not a recent concept. Its roots can be linked back to the theories of the economist Ricardo, whose ambition sought to facilitate the United Kingdom to expand its global trade power. However, what was originally a commercial expansion initiative has transformed into a control mechanism by High Finance, marked by the ascendancy of neoliberal capitalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions supported by economic consensus, the author proves that neoliberalism is actually a structure based on old customs, going back to four and a half millennia.
The critique also covers the administration of the European Union, perceived as a series of concessions that have contributed to increasing the authority of large economic groups instead of safeguarding the rights of citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations opposed to a citizen support, is contested. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only intensified the disbelief of the author regarding the EU’s ability to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the prior faults that have led to the current situation, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also suggests responses aimed at reframing Union strategies in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the overall content.
The book dives more intensely into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that govern worldwide transactions. The exploration encompasses the way in which governmental and economic orientations are influenced by a restricted circle of dominant financial powers, generally at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, orchestrated via organizations like the Bank for International Settlements and the IMS, deploys a disproportionate influence on global economic policies.
The writer reveals how these institutions, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have throughout history controlled financial markets and national economic systems to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, opposite to a salvific alternative to old monetary restrictions, is described as a domination system, profiting a restricted circle at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic depicts the European single currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The conversion to the euro is described as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded populations from decision-making processes, while aggravating internal differences within the European Union.
The effects of these approaches manifest in the increase in national debts, economic torpor, and a sustained austerity policy that has weakened living conditions across the continent. The author emphasizes that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the EU continues to risk potential disruptions, potentially more destructive.
In conclusion, the book calls for a democratic revolution where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and real democratic participation that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on just and solid foundations.
My source about History of the BRI or the Nazis at Powers
The thinker suggests that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where decisions are made and applied in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, rather than the narrow interests of high finance.